Thursday, October 16, 2008

Debates over as candidates face final days of race...

Barack Obama and John McCain return to the road 19 days before the presidential election, with the Republican looking to hold onto traditionally GOP states as the Democrat edges into his turf. Fresh off his energetic debate performance, McCain planned to visit swing states but is also forced to go to Republican territory, as polls show Obama with the edge in such places as Virginia, Colorado and Florida.

Obama, who held his ground in the third and final debate, is headed to Virginia and Missouri later this week — states that often have been out of reach for Democrats in past elections but are up for grabs this year. Looking to shake up the race, McCain questioned Obama's character and his policies Wednesday night. He linked Obama to a 1960s radical, accused him of planning tax increases that would cripple the economy and said he was dishonest about a promise to accept public campaign financing. Obama ignored that charge and remained calm throughout the debate. He often turned the accusations back against McCain, calling them examples of the petty politics harming the country.

"The important point here is, though, the American people have become so cynical about our politics, because all they see is a tit-for-tat and back-and-forth," the Illinois senator said. "And what they want is the ability to just focus on some really big challenges that we face right now."

McCain went on offense from the opening moments of the debate, accusing Obama of waging class warfare by seeking tax increases that would "spread the wealth around." He also demanded to know the full extent of Obama's relationship with William Ayers, a 1960s-era terrorist, and the Democrat's ties with ACORN, a liberal group accused of violating federal law as it seeks to register voters. McCain said the group could be on the verge of "destroying the fabric of democracy." McCain sought to blunt one of Obama's sharpest lines of attack: the Republican's ties to the unpopular incumbent president. "I am not President Bush. If you wanted to run against President Bush, you should have run four years ago," McCain said. Obama returned each volley, and brushed aside McCain's claim to full political independence.

"If I've occasionally mistaken your policies for George Bush's policies, it's because on the core economic issues that matter to the American people — on tax policy, on energy policy, on spending priorities — you have been a vigorous supporter of President Bush," he said.

He condemned Ayers' violent activities and denied any significant ties to ACORN, mocking McCain for bringing them up. The 90-minute encounter at Hofstra University marked the beginning of a sprint to Election Day. Obama leads in the national polls and in surveys in many battleground states, an advantage built in the weeks since the nation stumbled into the greatest economic crisis since the Great Depression. [End of report]

I watched the debate earlier this morning and overall, I have to say McCain did a better job. I know that Im an Obama supporter and therefore, I should be supporting him but I was a bit disappointed with him during today's debate for not being offensive enough as I wanted him to be. But then again, maybe he doesnt need to. McCain on the other hand was already attacking Obama at the start of the debate all the way until the end of it. What did Obama do? Well he just tried to keep cool and he managed to keep his composure all the way throughout the debate. McCain attacked Obama on a number of different issues and policies such as his economic plans, to his connection with Bill Ayers, a former 1960s radical who belonged to the Weather Underground and abortion rights among others. I noticed throughout the debate, including the previous 2, McCain likes to talk about Obama's judgment and character more than his policies unlike Obama who had to correct the facts and who was more interested to talk about the problems and the solutions to it. I think this just show how desperate the McCain campaign has become that they are more interested to talk about issues that are less important in my opinion to the people and they have every reason to be. I mean Obama is currently having the upper hand now, he is leading in most of the important states, and as you can read from the report, he is having the edge in places like Florida and Virginia, which is traditionally a Republican states.

Now back to the debate, I thought some of McCain's accusations are really funny. For example, he talk about why he is not pleased with Obama for not standing up and denounced negative comments made about McCain by bringing up the case of John Lewis for example. I think John McCain had forgotten during some of his rallies, there were some of his supporters that shouted words such as 'terrorist' and 'take his head off' when Obama's name was mentioned. To be fair to McCain, yes he did denounced all of it but he didnt do it like immediately, he waited for a few days before doing that. He then once again brought up the issue of Obama's relationship with Bill Ayers. McCain's campaign has charged that Obama's association with Ayers should cause voters to question his judgment. Obama then argued that Ayers had committed "despicable acts" 40 years ago, but pointed out that he himself had been 8 years old at the time. For me, I dont think that accusation from McCain is valid at all. I just think he is trying to find everything possible that he could use to link Obama with that would cause the voters to change their minds about Obama because he knows that that is probably the only way he could win the support as policies wise, I believe Obama has the edge over McCain.

I think that is why McCain is doing the attacking more than Obama because he knows that he will have to go on the offensive if he wants to have any chance of winning the election later and time is running out for him to do that. He have no other choice but to attack, attack and attack Obama. As for Obama, I think he should be feeling a little bit more comfortable now, which is probably why he wasnt as offensive as McCain during all the debates especially the last one. I know I have said earlier that I thought McCain did better during the debate, but I went to do some research and found out that most people think Obama won it. A CNN/Opinion Research poll of people who watched the debate found 58 percent said Obama did the best job while 31 percent said McCain did. A CBS poll meanwhile had Obama winning the exchange, 39-27 percent. I dont normally look at polls so those statistics doesnt mean much to me, but of course being an Obama supporter, I am pleased to hear that kind of result. At the end of the day, it really doesnt matter much whether it was Obama or McCain who won the debate because its the election in 3 weeks time that will decide everything. That will be the time that they will have to win. I cant wait for it. I cant believe that it will happen in 3 weeks time, so that is why I have decided to put the big countdown box on the top right hand side of my blog to remind me. Until then, lets just continue to hope and pray that Obama will win.




*The report was taken from Associated Press.

Wednesday, October 15, 2008

Calling all ex-5A students...

For Immediate Release
Office of the Press Secretary
October 15, 2008


Listen up all former BNSS students from 5A last year. In celebration of Hari Raya, I would like to organise a Hari Raya outing for all the guys from the class. Actually, this was Syairazi's idea, but I am glad to help out in anyway. Our good friends from 5B has had their own outing recently, so it is only right that we have ours as well. Some of you might be wondering, isnt Hari Raya over yet? Well actually not. If you look at the Muslim calendar, we are still in the Hari Raya month so it is completely reasonable to still celebrate it.

Among the people who are expected to join or have told their interest to come for the outing are Syairazi, Azam, Hasri, myself and Azlan. He is hoping that some of you can spread the message across and tell the others like Syazwan, Fitri, Dinur and any other malay friends you could think of. As this is a class event, non-malay students are also invited to join in the fun. It will also be a good time for us to get together again after not seeing one another for a long time. And due to the fact that the I will be heading for his National Service soon, I am hoping that at least 90% of the class could make it. It would give me a big boost before heading for my duty call if I get to meet you guys for one final time. Speaking of National Service, you do not want to miss the important message that I will tell soon, so stay tune to my blog.

But for now, if you are one of the people who are interested to join but have not inform Syairazi or me, you can do that before this Saturday. Yes the outing will be held on this Saturday. If you cant make it, then probably you will have to wait for the next Hari Raya, that if of course there is another outing. If you have any questions or if you want to register yourself, please contact Syairazi or me through the various way possible, like MSN, email, handphone (preferably) etc. Until next time, see you on Saturday.

*I will allow you to copy and paste this whole post on your blog if you think it will help in getting more of our friends to know about the outing. Delete the things that are not relevant like the NS thingy if you want. Thanks.

Tuesday, October 14, 2008

Malaysia honours Bollywood star amid outcry...


Bollywood star Shah Rukh Khan will now flaunt the prefix ‘Datuk’, a traditional title conferred by the Malaysian royalty. Khan is among 78 others including Malaysia’s navy chief, academics and artists, to receive the award, in conjunction with the Malacca governor’s 70th birthday. The 42-year-old actor was honoured with the governor’s award for his contribution in promoting Malaysia to the region’s film industry, state officials said.

His 2001 movie, “One 2 Ka 4” was filmed at a popular resort in Malacca.

“This resulted in many people visiting Malacca. The award was given in recognition of this,” said Malacca chief minister Mohamad Ali Rustam.

However, this move was met by criticism by opposition lawmakers and the public. Opposition parliamentarian Lim Kit Siang said he was “astounded”.

“Are there no Malaysian film stars, artists or sports-people who have greater (talent) to be honoured and encouraged as compared to Shah Rukh?” Lim said in a statement.

Not only is Khan very popular among women of all ages in Malaysia, but Bollywood films in general have a huge following among the country's ethnic Indians and majority Muslim-Malays. [End of report]

When I first saw this news, I couldnt believe it because I thought the prefix 'Datuk' was only eligible for Malaysians only, but of course I was wrong. Now before I continue, I just want to tell my non-malay readers that the Datuk Im referring here is the title for someone who has contributed a lot of the country, in this case Malaysia and not the datuk as in someone grandfather. As you can read from the report, the title is usually conferred by the Malaysian royalty, thats why you have the 'Datuk' on the front of their Prime Minister's name, Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, but in actual truth, anyone can be call a Datuk as long as you have contributed in some way to the country, but of course your contributions must be met at a certain standard before you can be conferred that title. Well at least that is what I believe it to be. I dont know about you, but I think this is the first time that I heard a foreigner being awarded that title. Maybe there are others before Shah Rukh Khan, but he is probably the biggest name individual who is not from the country that to be getting that honour. If anyone of you know any other big name to be getting that honour before and who is not a citizen of the country either, please tell me.

The problem though with Shah Rukh Khan is not whether he was born in Malaysia or not, but rather its the question of whether he deserve to be awarded that title. The reason why he is getting it is because of his contribution in promoting Malaysia to the region’s film and tourism industry, well that is according to the Malacca chief minister. Im not sure whether it is true or not, I mean just because he had done a film at Malacca will automatically mean people will start to come and visit the place. It is certainly good way to showcase the place, I mean having a Bollywood movie being filmed at your country is a good way to attract tourists. Bollywood is probably one of the big movie industry in the world, after Hollywood so there is a good chance that a lot of people will get the chance to see your country through it films and might consider spending their time visiting your country. But then again, it was only one movie. I find it difficult to believe that that one movie alone is enough to attract so many tourists to the state. I am also unsure if it was Shah Rukh Khan decision to have the movie filmed there or whether it was the director because if it was the director, then I dont know if Shah Rukh Khan deserved that title.

Some of you might be wondering, whats so good about being called a Datuk? Well there are a lot actually but most of the benefits are limited to be use in the country only. For example, if you are a Datuk, people will respect you or you can get the proper treatment from say airline reservations, car rental, hotel reservation and many more in Malaysia. And if the birthday of the Sultan or King is coming, you will be invited. I believe the awarding of the title can be done on a state-to-state basis, you dont have to get the approve of the government to get it, but the Datuk title will always be with you everytime you decide to travel in other places of the country, that doesnt change I think. Im not sure what most Malaysians or Malaccans have in mind regarding the news, but Im sure for most of the women, they dont mind at all. I know for the fact that Bollywood movies are very popular in the country, particularly the women even here in Singapore, there is a huge following among our malay community. I used to watch their movies but I got bored after a while. The new movies that are showing now is not as good as the old ones so I dont follow it much anymore. Anyway, back to the topic, I believe Shah Rukh Khan will gladly accept that title even though some people might be unhappy about it, its not like he need it, but its a great gift from the governor so why turn it down?

I think Ive said before in one of my previous post that I have a kampung in Malacca, so in a way, I feel proud and happy that they are giving Shah Rukh Khan the Datuk title. It makes me feel like he is our own Datuk, not just any Datuk, one that is very popular around the world. But at the same time, I thought he didnt really deserve it. But its the governor's decision, he can do whatever he want, and if he is happy, then the people should be too. Who knows maybe more Bollywood film will be produce in Malacca again so that maybe any actor or actress can get that title too. Anyway on a personal note, I dont really care about these titles, whether it is the Datuk or Sir in United Kingdom. It doesnt matter much to me. It is just a title, thats all it will not change who you are, but every country has their own reasons to continue having it, so I will leave it that way as long as they are happy.



*The report was taken from ChannelNewsAsia

Sunday, October 12, 2008

Just to refresh your memory...

For Immediate Release
Office of the Press Secretary
October 11, 2008


Attention all. This is an important message from the Blogging God. It concerns you and his blog. He would just like to remind you an old news, which is one of the most important rule on his blog and that is the ban on the use of the following acronyms and word listed below:-

1. LOL
2. OMG
3. Whatever

He knows that these are just some of the acronyms and one of the word that most of you like to use on your blogs for absolutely no reason whatsoever, but the Blogging God hates all of it. He do not understand why some of you like to use it even on yourself. You will say something and you will add 'LOL' or 'OMG' to it. It sounds too cute and corny for the Blogging God liking, so that is why he has decided to ban it on his blog. If you are thinking about what you should write for replacement, you can replace it with these:-

1. Its hilarious/ HaHa
2. OMBG (Oh my Blogging God)
3. DWUW (Do what you want)

If anyone of you still write those silly acronyms after reading this, you must be stupid or you are acting foolish because you are still doing the wrong thing despite being told what is the right thing to do. It will be much better if you just tag your comments and not add anything after it. The Blogging God will not hesitate to take actions against repeated offenders. If it is your first time, you will be warn, if it is your second time, your tag will be deleted and if it is your third time, he will remove you from his link of blogs. Thank You for your attention and keep logging on to the Blogging God's blog everyday, the number one blog on the Internet.

Oh and before he end, he need your help in finding a blazer. He would like to know if anyone of you know any shop which sells blazer costing $150/-. He is not interested to listen to 'I think' answers but rather he only want to hear 'I know' answers because he dont want to waste him time going to a place that he is not really sure if it is selling the thing he is looking for.

Saturday, October 11, 2008

The Blogging God welcome the election of Khoo Boon Hui as Interpol President...

For Immediate Release
Office of the Press Secretary
October 11, 2008



The Blogging God today is pleased to hear the news of our very own Police Commissioner Khoo Boon Hui as the new INTERPOL president. For those of you who have no idea what INTERPOL is, it stands for International Criminal Police Organisation, and it has 187 member countries. INTERPOL aims to facilitate international police co-operation even where diplomatic relations do not exist between particular countries.

Khoo was chosen by a panel of delegates at the end of the general assembly of the 187-country police organisation in Saint Petersburg, Russia, according to a statement on its website. Khoo will replace South Africa's chief of police Jackie Selebi, who resigned in January after prosecutors announced their intention to charge him over his links to a businessman accused of murder. The Blogging God is proud that a fellow Singaporean has been selected to lead such a fine organisation which plays an important role in ensuring security and stability around the world. He has every belief that Khoo will do a good job as the president and that INTERPOL will continue to achieve better things under his leadership. His experience as the Police Commissioner for Singapore will no doubt help him a lot in doing his job and the Blogging God is sure that every member of the organisation will have every confidence and faith in his ability, which probably explain the reason why he was elected to be the new presient.

Khoo will serve a four-year term as president of INTERPOL's executive committee, in addition to his existing duties as commissioner of the Singapore Police Force. He will be based in Singapore. The Blogging God would like to wish him well in his job as the president of INTERPOL and he knows that Khoo will make not just Singapore, but the world of justice proud as well.

CNN reveals Top 10 Heroes of 2008...






For Liz McCartney, selection as one of the Top 10 CNN Heroes of 2008 could not have come at a better time.

"With the recent storms in Texas and southwest Louisiana, we have experienced a sudden drop in volunteers," said McCartney, whose St. Bernard Project helps Hurricane Katrina survivors rebuild their homes just outside New Orleans, Louisiana.

"While other areas need help, this recognition is letting the American people know that the New Orleans area still matters," McCartney said.

The diverse group of honorees includes a Cambodian activist who offers free schooling to children who work in Phnom Penh's trash dump; a Georgia prosthetist-orthotist who provides limbs and braces to hundreds of people in Mexico; and a Virginia woman who tapes video messages from incarcerated parents for their children. CNN's Anderson Cooper announced the 10 honorees Thursday on "American Morning." CNN launched its second annual global search for ordinary people accomplishing extraordinary deeds in February. The network has aired weekly CNN Hero profiles of those people, chosen from more than 3,700 nominations submitted by viewers in 75 countries.

A panel made up of world leaders and luminaries recognized for their own dedication to public service selected the Top 10. The Blue Ribbon Panel includes humanitarians such as Archbishop Emeritus Desmond Tutu, Jane Goodall, Kristi Yamaguchi and Deepak Chopra. Each of this year's Top 10 CNN Heroes will receive $25,000 and will be honored at "CNN Heroes: An All-Star Tribute," airing from the Kodak Theatre in Hollywood on November 27.

Hosted by Cooper, the Thanksgiving night broadcast will culminate with the announcement of the CNN Hero of the Year, selected by the public in an online poll that began Thursday morning. Continuing through November 19, viewers can log on to CNN.com/Heroes to participate in the poll. The person receiving the most votes will receive an additional $100,000.
[End of report]

I am not going to say much here but Im just going to share a few thoughts on the topic. I was really happy when I heard that there's going to be another edition of CNN Heroes this year. I really enjoyed it last year. There was a lot of inspiring people with inspiring stories who got rewarded for everything they have done. Some of them didnt do much as compared to others, but sometimes, all you need to do is a simple deed to change someone else's life. I dont think they did all those things to get rewarded or recognised, but because it is like a calling for them to help others in need and it is something that anyone of any age, race or sex can do which is to help or contribute towards making someone life better or making the world a better place to live in.

This year's CNN Heroes will be happening on Thanksgiving which will be on November 27. I really hope that I will not be call upon by the army yet for my National Service so that I can watch it live, but if I cant do that, then I guess I will just have to record it and watch it when Im back. If there is any award shows I recommend you to watch, then this is it. It is a show worth watching because it rewards real people who really deserve it, instead of those waste of time award shows that reward some singers of actors for doing what they are paid to do. That is not the real heroes for me. Real heroes for me are people who gives without being asked and who are willing to risk their life for others. Anyway, I would like to urge you to visit the website above which is CNN.com/Heroes to see all the top 10 CNN Heroes for this year and remember to vote for your favourite hero even if you dont have CNN to watch it later or you can click on the widget above to go to the link and vote. This is your opportunity to change someone else's life forever so dont miss it.


*The report was taken from CNN.

US to remove North Korea from terror blacklist...


The Bush administration plans to remove North Korea from a terrorism blacklist on Saturday after getting assurances the Stalinist nation has agreed to a plan to inspect its nuclear facilities, that's according to The Associated Press. President Bush signed off on the move on Friday in a bid to salvage a faltering accord aimed at getting the North to abandon atomic weapons, according to diplomats briefed on the matter.

The removal is provisional and North Korea will be put back on the State Department's "state sponsors of terrorism" list if it doesn't comply with the inspections, they said. The diplomats spoke on condition of anonymity because the administration has not yet announced the step. The expected delisting comes as North Korea moves to restart a disabled nuclear reactor and takes other provocative actions, including expelling U.N. inspectors and test firing missiles, that have heightened tensions and threaten the shaky disarmament agreement. It also follows days of intense internal debate in Washington and consultations with U.S. negotiating partners China, South Korea, Russia and Japan. Japan had balked at the move because the North has not yet resolved issues related to its abduction of Japanese citizens. Neither the White House nor the State Department would comment on the decision, which has been in the works since chief U.S. negotiator Christopher Hill returned from a trip to North Korea late last week. But earlier Friday, U.S. officials said they were trying to build consensus among negotiating partners on the step as well as the inspection regime that Washington insists must accompany the delisting. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice spoke on Friday with the foreign ministers of China, South Korea and Japan and was trying to reach her Russian counterpart, State Department spokesman Sean McCormack told reporters.

At issue was whether tentative arrangements worked out last week between Hill and the North Koreans were acceptable to the others. Under those terms, the U.S. would provisionally remove North Korea from the terror list once the North agrees to the inspections. McCormack dismissed suggestions the United States was trying to force an agreement on its partners and declined to say which, if any, countries were preventing a consensus. However, Japan had been resistant, arguing that North Korea should not be taken off the list until the cases of Japanese citizens abducted by Pyongyang in the 1970s and '80s are resolved. In Tokyo on Friday, Japanese Foreign Minister Hirofumi Nakasone said his country could accept a U.S. move to remove North Korea from the list but only if it was reasonable. And in Washington, Japanese Finance Minister Shoichi Nakagawa used a meeting of the world's top economies to urge the United States to keep in mind Japanese unease over the threat of North Korean nuclear weapons and missiles and about its past kidnapping of Japanese citizens. It was not immediately clear how or if Japan was swayed, although a senior U.S. official said the administration was working urgently to meet Japanese concerns amid fears the entire denuclearization deal would collapse.

Under the 2007 disarmament deal, the North was to have disabled its main nuclear facility and the United States was to have removed it from the terrorism list. But after the Yongbyon reactor was disabled in June, the U.S. said it would not delist the country until it agreed to an intrusive verification regime. But under a face-saving compromise proposed by Hill, the agreement could be deposited with the Chinese hosts of the six-nation talks and announced at the same time as the delisting. When that point is reached, McCormack said North Korea would be required to halt and reverse its recent actions. [End of report]

Now if you have been reading my blog all this while, you should remember I did talk about the issue in one of my previous post in which I said that the wise thing for the U.S. to do right now is that they remove North Korea from the terror blacklist. When I said that, I didnt mean that they should just listen to North Korea demands and do as they are told in order to achieve their goal which is to have a North Korea free of nuclear weapons. Instead, what I meant was that they should remove them from the list if only the North Koreans are willing to verify the disarmament process. I remember saying that in my previous post, the U.S. should just remove the Koreans from the list despite not achieving the verification process, but I would like to retract my statement. Yes, the North Koreans are expressing their feelings of anger towards the U.S. and other parties involved in the denuclearization talks by starting back their nuclear reactor, in particular that of Yongbyon, but I still think they need the aid more that are being offered to them as part of the exchange for their denuclearization of nuclear weapons. I think the North Koreans are just using the threat of restarting their nuclear reactor in order to achieve their own goal which is to have the U.S. removing it from the terror blacklist, but one that should be taken seriously. It is very important that the U.S. and the other parties involved don't lose the gains that have been achieved to get to the position that they are in right now. That is why you saw the chief U.S. negotiator Christopher Hill, returned from a trip to North Korea late last week to somehow strike a deal that would go well with both the U.S. and North Korea.

Im not sure what were being discussed during the meeting, or whether there were any progress that were made. It does seem that is the case though as you can read from the report, the U.S. is considering to remove North Korea from the terror blacklist. If that were to happen, it would solely be base on the U.S. decision alone I think as the State Department spokesman Sean McCormack said that no decision has been taken yet on delisting North Korea, after saying that the United States and its negotiating partners were still discussing verification steps. It is important that all parties agree on the decision to remove North Korea from the terror blacklist because all of them play a very important role on the matter, but it seems like there is going to be a major hurdle in getting the deal through and that hurdle comes in the form of Japan. You can read on the report that said Japan reason for resisting the move could be because the cases of Japanese citizens abducted by Pyongyang in the 1970s and '80s are not resolved yet. I believe that it would be really unfortunate if any decision, which is aimed at easing the tension, is being derail for such a thing. I dont think Japan should be putting its national interest into the entire matter as it could affect a new agreement being agreed upon. Whatever external problems they have with Pyongyang should be discuss and settle by themselves.

Right now, Im not sure whether the delisting of North Korea will actually go through or not. I am expecting it to go through without any problems. I dont really have any problem with the move as the removal is provisional and North Korea will be put back on the terror blacklist if it doesn't comply with the inspections. The main aim for everybody right now is that they should not allow Pyongyang to restart the Yongbyon reactor because that would mean disaster once again. Ive read somewhere today that the verification would at present cover only the North's admitted plutonium bomb-making programme, and not a suspected secret enriched uranium programme. I dont think the verification plans is perfect yet, but we should take things one at a time. Its is a very complicated issue and whatever that can be achieved for the good should be look at as only the first step. There are more things that needs to be done, but we should not get ahead with ourselves and do something that could anger North Korea as it will not help the matter further.




*The report was taken from Associated Press.